F-14 Tomcat Flashback

No political or religious topics please. Otherwise, anything goes, as long as we treat each other with respect.
User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: F-14 Tomcat Flashback

Postby kham » Thu Feb 04, 2016 8:44 pm

:shock:
That would have been embarrassing. I havent watched the movie in years, gotta check that out.

Yeah, you just said something a lot of the smart, ie -- expert :) Fighter Pilots write and talk about ; Young Guys need to be taught to not just honk on the stick of their 9-G killing machine until their eyeballs bleed :D Energy State, is the key thing. Forget that, And as Mugs put it, somebody's gonna be walking home. But it wasn't him :twisted:

User avatar
nachtjaeger
Posts: 2373
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:45 am
Location: upstate NY USA
Contact:

Re: F-14 Tomcat Flashback

Postby nachtjaeger » Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:50 am

How were the airframes on the Tomcats (before they got guillotined into scrap, that is)? Did they have enough life left to be worth refitting them with upgraded engines and avionics?
This space for rent- advertise your product or service here!

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: F-14 Tomcat Flashback

Postby kham » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:32 am

AFAIK, the D-Model Toms were all in perfect shape, already having had digital avionics upgrades and all the whistles to near F-15 Beagle standards. And they already had the big F-110 engines

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4262
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: F-14 Tomcat Flashback

Postby Duncan Edwards » Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:59 am

The F-14D could have flown for a long time to come but it's mission changed. The navy no longer required the services of a monster interceptor to deal with Soviet bomber fleets and cruise missiles. What they were after was more air-to-ground capability and a smaller crew. The Hornet fit that bill and got really popular when the budgets declined. Awesome aircraft for it's mission but it flew itself into obsolescence.
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: F-14 Tomcat Flashback

Postby kham » Sat Feb 06, 2016 1:31 pm

I think if you start digging into it Dunc, you only get mad. For the Toms were already doing the Strike mission, and pretty well too. The proposed varients for the 'Super-Tomcat 21" would have filled the role that the super-geniuses had already killed with the A-6 and not replaced. Advanced Nav/Attack systems, Supercruise capability with F110-229 engines up to 1.3 Mach, thrust-vectoring nozzles and perhaps using radar from the canceled A-12. But. Those Mobile 57mm Guns dont pay for themselves at 400 million a crack.....

gvsqsre1
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:55 am

Re: F-14 Tomcat Flashback

Postby gvsqsre1 » Mon Feb 08, 2016 2:29 pm

no question the F-14 Tomcat and F-15 Eagle are great aircraft. But let's not forget the most important thing in any fighter, the pilot! Those pilots who flew those aircraft were the best in the world, that's why American navy and airforce are so great(best in the world)! On more thing, the flight deck of an aircraft carrier is a very dangerous place! If you had no business on the flight deck, you simply did not go there, my naval friends tell me.


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests