Thanks Max.
Based on our conversations I know that Renee is a bit too big for your tastes. But this effort was more of a proof of concept than anything else. However, I might be on to something new in my struggle to rectify The Great Nipple Shortage of 2026. If Grok is programmed to automatically remove all nipples, areolae and teats from any of its generated images, then I might have a workaround for that.
Grok can produce images from scratch, based purely on the inputs from its users. But it can also accept downloaded images fed into it by a user. So, if I told it to '
submerge these women in quicksand up to their chests', it would do so. Because they are fully clothed and not baring anything worthy of censorship.
exp.jpg
But if I asked it to do the same thing with this image...
djz33eo.jpg
...it would refuse to do so OR sink her below her breasts OR cover them up with discrete dollops of mud over the offending areas.
But what if it asked it do so with this image?
djz33eoCopy.jpg
Now there's nothing for it to be offended by and nothing for it to censor. So it could go ahead and sink her up to those lovely boobies in some nasty, sticky quicksand. At least, that's the theory. If it does so accurately, then I can use my photomanipulation skills to blend the girl's boobs from the original pic onto the newly-generated quicksand peril pic.
At least... that's the theory, Max. All of this is nothing more than an unworked plan in my imagination. I don't know if it'll work. And if it does, I still don't know how much work the process will involve. These are what Rumsfeld would call, 'known unknowns'. So, please maintain a holding pattern and in due time I'll report back here with news, ok?
Thanks,
Redjak.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.