Page 1 of 1
What makes for good NON QS images
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:39 am
by reisen55
Very often when browsing the web, I come across images of women (apologies Nessie) in a jungle setting, by a lake or on a beach or in a bath that almost - but not really quite - approximates a quicksand image or a good quicksand pose. Sometimes the chosen model and background is sooooo close you can almost taste, or sink, it. So this thread to pose a thought what is the next BEST thing to a quicksand mud image? About my closest cousin is a good, thick bubblebath which at least performs the job aside from being white and fluffy.
Re: What makes for good NON QS images
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:29 am
by bart1997
.
Re: What makes for good NON QS images
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:14 pm
by stevensenechal
Ha! It's a trick question! Only a fool would believe there is anything worthy in any non-quicksand imagery whatsoever! The Mona Lisa without quicksand: crap. A photo of sunset without quicksand: crap. A photo of a basket full of puppies without quicksand: crap. Give me quicksand or nothing! Nothing! NOTHING! Ha ha ha ha ha!
Re: What makes for good NON QS images
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:17 pm
by stevensenechal
Ignore the above reply as my evil twin somehow found my password to the site. I totally get your 'line of thought' with this thread. I see a hot chick walking down the street and I want the pavement to turn into you know what.....

Re: What makes for good NON QS images
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:07 am
by quagmire_uk
Lol do you mean a friend of yours logged into the site as yourself, or do you have two personalities? (If the latter, pretty interesting that they are both into quicksand!)