Outfits not commonly sunk in

Sink Into On-Topic Discussions
Fred588
Producer
Posts: 17883
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:37 pm
Location: Central Arkansas (At Studio 588)
Contact:

Re: Outfits not commonly sunk in

Postby Fred588 » Wed Apr 09, 2025 12:25 pm

Duncan Edwards wrote:
Fred588 wrote:This morning I had occasion to look through the wardrobe collection - looking for an item sent by someone else for a custom a few years ago. Kristine's prom dress is not in the collection, although damn near everything else used and abandoned in the past IS there.


A substantial collection, no doubt. We were visited by Sarge, a compulsive organizer :lol: , last summer. He did a brilliant job of reviewing, discovering, cleaning, classifying and cataloging a lot of things lost to time. You can see some of it at mpv.artifacts on the MPV Discord. Looking at all that makes me wonder if it's just my imagination that we did that much nudity.


Possibly you are payng more attention when there is nudity?

At Studio 588, in the workshop building, theree are ten "wardrobe boxes." Each is four feet in length, with a bar at the top for hangers, except for two of the boxes which have two bars. Thus, there are 48 feet of items on hangers. That does not include, of course, all the items for which hangers make no sense, such as shoes, boots, hats, bathing suits, and so on.
Studio 588 currently offers more than 2200 different HD and QD quicksand videos and has supported production of well over 2400 video scenes and other projects by 20 different producers. Info may be found at:
http://studio588qs.com
http://quicksandland.com
http://psychicworldjungleland.com

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4886
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: Outfits not commonly sunk in

Postby Duncan Edwards » Wed Apr 09, 2025 2:13 pm

Fred588 wrote:Possibly you are paying more attention when there is nudity?


Me? I'm not that kind of guy.

DSC_0045 (2).JPG


Fred588 wrote:At Studio 588, in the workshop building, there are ten "wardrobe boxes." Each is four feet in length, with a bar at the top for hangers, except for two of the boxes which have two bars. Thus, there are 48 feet of items on hangers. That does not include, of course, all the items for which hangers make no sense, such as shoes, boots, hats, bathing suits, and so on.


Wardrobe tended to multiply while the lights were out. By the time we were done there was a similar situation with the "attic stage" being full of boxes and drawers. Something like 700 sq. ft. of wardrobe and accessories. Just waiting.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.

Johnjoe777
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:14 pm

Re: Outfits not commonly sunk in

Postby Johnjoe777 » Sun Jul 27, 2025 11:21 pm

polonium_kransky wrote:Onesies/Kigurumi akin to SAZAC or similar: I have never seen a clip of this nor do I believe there are clips of those. It would be nice to see a nice cute onesie outfit sinking in mud/quicksand and come out all caked in mud. I dont see much of a safety reason why these are not used.


I have actually had some interest in these myself. Something about the idea of these soft cute costumes getting caked in muck sounds great. They might get a bit heavy in the mud but I don't think it would make dangerous.

polonium_kransky
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2023 2:53 pm

Re: Outfits not commonly sunk in

Postby polonium_kransky » Fri Aug 01, 2025 8:52 am

Johnjoe777 wrote:
polonium_kransky wrote:Onesies/Kigurumi akin to SAZAC or similar: I have never seen a clip of this nor do I believe there are clips of those. It would be nice to see a nice cute onesie outfit sinking in mud/quicksand and come out all caked in mud. I dont see much of a safety reason why these are not used.


I have actually had some interest in these myself. Something about the idea of these soft cute costumes getting caked in muck sounds great. They might get a bit heavy in the mud but I don't think it would make dangerous.


Yeah, while I can imagine they can get heavy, I think you can take them off *relatively* easily. Apart from the audience of most QS scenes preferring different (or no) outfits and possibly above, I’m not too sure why pretty much nobody has created a sinking scene with these outfits yet, would be an interesting concept

SillyPrincess
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2025 3:18 pm

Re: Outfits not commonly sunk in

Postby SillyPrincess » Tue Aug 05, 2025 3:23 pm

I suppose it's mostly a concern of practicality, but I can think of nothing better than sinking in a beautiful princess dress/wedding dress. It definitely makes for the perfect damsel in distress scenario. I've accumulated a couple of lovely dresses like that from charity shops and I can't wait to find the right spot for them. But it's hard to come by outfits like that, especially when you know they might be completely ruined by the end of it. But to me it's half the fun! :3

MuddySkater
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:27 pm
Location: North Lincolnshire. UK.

Re: Outfits not commonly sunk in

Postby MuddySkater » Fri Aug 29, 2025 4:28 pm

Over the years I've done my fare share of costumes although mostly wearing different coloured Morph suits ( lycra one piece suits ) but I have also worn full shirt and tie suits, super hero costumes and even jumped in a local spot wearing Force FX Storm trooper armour, and you have all heard to the jokes stormtroopers can't aim well try climbing out a sloppy stick mud quarry wearing kit - its not easy.

Mind I have seen a guy wear an inflatable costume of the marshmallow man from the Ghostbusters film, he jumped in then wiggled around for a bit and sank to his mid chest and got totally covered then panicked and started shouting for help as the suit's mass made it hard for him to get any traction to climb out - although the funnest costume wasn't planned. But some random workman on a building site after hours came over to the silted up mud area next to where the building site was, he jumped in wearing his work wear hi hiv kit and boots! he can't of been older than mid 30's he jumped in and sank. it took him a few seconds to come up for air then struggle to climb out covered.

Only to spent the next ten minutes trying to find his car keys! he jumped back in trying to find them to no luck and climbed out only to find them with his mobile over near his car! watching him on the security office CCTV was rather enjoyable


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests